MJLST   Joint Degree Program   Law School   UofM Home

























Conferences & Lectures > Lunch Series > Kurt Gottfried

  View Video Online      Duration: 90
RealPlayer is required to view video. Free Download



Kurt Gottfried is Emeritus Professor of Physics at Cornell University and Co-founder of the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS).

Gottfried was instrumental in the drafting of the highly publicized 2004 report released by UCS entitled Scientific Integrity in Policy Making, charging the Bush administration with widespread and unprecedented "manipulation of the process through which science enters into its decisions"
These reports created a cascade of responses from the U.S government and policymakers, and an outpouring of support and call to action from U.S. scientists.

The UCS remains committed to continuing to investigate and publicize cases--corroborated by witnesses and documentation--in which politics is allowed to stifle or distort the integrity of the scientific process in governmental policy making.


In addition to his key role with UCS, Dr. Gottfried has served on the senior staff of the European Center for Nuclear Research in Geneva and is a former chair of the Division of Particles and Fields of the American Physical Society. He is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the Council on Foreign Relations.



Science and Politics: Problems and Solutions

Prof. Kurt Gottfried, PhD
Cornell University and Union of Concerned Scientists

Tuesday, Sept 19, 2006
12:15am - 1:30pm
Coffman Auditorium
Coffman Memorial Union

Professor Gottfried's interview on Minnesota Public Radio

Prof. Gottfried will discuss the current tumultuous relationship between science and government in America, highlighting unprecedented friction that he believes stems from deep cultural and political currents.  In order to re-establish a harmonious relationship, Gottfried urges that Congress, together with the Executive Branch, scientists, and society as a whole must participate in an effort to recreate the connection that existed in previous administrations.  Both short and long-term policies to address this challenge will be discussed.

Following this lecture, participants should be able to:

  • Discuss current national controversies regarding the use of science in policymaking.

  • Explain how these controversies affect researchers, policymakers, and the public.

Application for CME and CNE Credits filed with the University of Minnesota Office of Continuing Medical Education. Determination of credit is pending. Credit is sought only for those attending the live lecture; credit will not be given for viewing videotapes after the lecture. Continuing legal education credit (CLE) for attorneys will be requested (1 hour).

It is the policy of the University of Minnesota’s Office of Continuing Medical Education to ensure balance, independence, objectivity and scientific rigor in all its sponsored educational activities. All faculty participating in sponsored programs are expected to disclose to the program audience any real or apparent conflict of interest related to the content of their presentation.


  


Copyright © 2001-08 Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences
Last Modified: Monday, September 17, 2007
Top of Page
Print This Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Site Map | Home